Looking for Real Estate Statistics?

Oops, Looking for the blog that every body's talking about right now? That's our Florida Real Estate Statistics Blog

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Foreclosure law firm can't be investigated by Florida's AG, court rules

Foreclosure law firm can't be investigated by Florida's AG, court rules
By KIMBERLY MILLER, The Palm Beach Post
Florida's attorney general has no authority to investigate a Boca Raton-based foreclosure law firm under a civil unfair trade practices statute, an appeals court ruled Wednesday.

In siding with the Shapiro & Fishman law firm, the 4th District Court of Appeals likely ended the state's current pursuit of subpoenas against other so-called "foreclosure mills," including the Law Offices of David J. Stern in Plantation.

Judge Spencer D. Levine wrote in Wednesday's ruling that the state's subpoena was not connected to "trade or commerce," a requirement when using Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act to investigate.

Spencer says the attorney general could have proceeded with "a criminal investigative subpoena if other relevant criteria were satisfied.

The decision upholds a circuit court ruling made in October by Palm Beach County Circuit Court Judge Jack S. Cox.

"The court ruled correctly in terms of it being a matter of law that there was no jurisdiction," said attorney Gerald Richman, who represents Shapiro & Fishman. "That being said, we have maintained all along that we would give them a reasonable amount of information in the spirit of cooperation, and we still offer to do that."

Jennifer Meale, communications director for the attorney general's office, said the ruling "explicitly" outlined other avenues the office could pursue. It is reviewing those options.

West Palm Beach foreclosure defense attorney Melva Rozier was disappointed with Wednesday's ruling.

"If the attorney general can't investigate law firms, where is the recourse? How do we protect the public?" Rozier asked.

In August, then-Attorney General Bill McCollum, a Republican candidate for governor, issued subpoenas to three foreclosure law firms; Shapiro & Fishman, the Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson, in Fort Lauderdale, and the Stern firm. A fourth firm, the Florida Default Law Group in Tampa was already under investigation.

The Watson law firm settled with newly elected Attorney General Pam Bondi last month, agreeing to pay $1 million to the attorney general's office for the cost of investigating and another $1 million to the Florida Bar Foundation to pay for Legal Aid attorney positions for foreclosure cases.

In October, Stern's firm lost a protest in Broward Circuit Court against the subpoena, although it used the same argument as Shapiro & Fishman. It has an appeal pending with the 4th District Court of Appeal.

"We're encouraged by this," said Stern attorney Jeff Tew, about Wednesday's ruling. "We made the same argument in our brief, and it was the same subpoena."

David J. Stern closed his foreclosure operations last month, leaving as many as 100,000 cases statewide in question as they are transferred to new attorneys.

Florida Default Law Group did not respond to a message concerning the status of the investigation.

Four other law Florida law firms are either under investigation by the attorney general's office for foreclosure-related concerns or have been issued "letters of inquiry" requesting information.

Foreclosure law firm can't be investigated by Florida's AG, court rules

Foreclosure law firm can't be investigated by Florida's AG, court rules
By KIMBERLY MILLER, The Palm Beach Post
Florida's attorney general has no authority to investigate a Boca Raton-based foreclosure law firm under a civil unfair trade practices statute, an appeals court ruled Wednesday.

In siding with the Shapiro & Fishman law firm, the 4th District Court of Appeals likely ended the state's current pursuit of subpoenas against other so-called "foreclosure mills," including the Law Offices of David J. Stern in Plantation.

Judge Spencer D. Levine wrote in Wednesday's ruling that the state's subpoena was not connected to "trade or commerce," a requirement when using Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act to investigate.

Spencer says the attorney general could have proceeded with "a criminal investigative subpoena if other relevant criteria were satisfied.

The decision upholds a circuit court ruling made in October by Palm Beach County Circuit Court Judge Jack S. Cox.

"The court ruled correctly in terms of it being a matter of law that there was no jurisdiction," said attorney Gerald Richman, who represents Shapiro & Fishman. "That being said, we have maintained all along that we would give them a reasonable amount of information in the spirit of cooperation, and we still offer to do that."

Jennifer Meale, communications director for the attorney general's office, said the ruling "explicitly" outlined other avenues the office could pursue. It is reviewing those options.

West Palm Beach foreclosure defense attorney Melva Rozier was disappointed with Wednesday's ruling.

"If the attorney general can't investigate law firms, where is the recourse? How do we protect the public?" Rozier asked.

In August, then-Attorney General Bill McCollum, a Republican candidate for governor, issued subpoenas to three foreclosure law firms; Shapiro & Fishman, the Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson, in Fort Lauderdale, and the Stern firm. A fourth firm, the Florida Default Law Group in Tampa was already under investigation.

The Watson law firm settled with newly elected Attorney General Pam Bondi last month, agreeing to pay $1 million to the attorney general's office for the cost of investigating and another $1 million to the Florida Bar Foundation to pay for Legal Aid attorney positions for foreclosure cases.

In October, Stern's firm lost a protest in Broward Circuit Court against the subpoena, although it used the same argument as Shapiro & Fishman. It has an appeal pending with the 4th District Court of Appeal.

"We're encouraged by this," said Stern attorney Jeff Tew, about Wednesday's ruling. "We made the same argument in our brief, and it was the same subpoena."

David J. Stern closed his foreclosure operations last month, leaving as many as 100,000 cases statewide in question as they are transferred to new attorneys.

Florida Default Law Group did not respond to a message concerning the status of the investigation.

Four other law Florida law firms are either under investigation by the attorney general's office for foreclosure-related concerns or have been issued "letters of inquiry" requesting information.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

FICO: Short sale no better for your credit score than foreclosure

APRIL 26, 2011

For borrowers going through the frustration of trying to market their home as a short sale, the big selling point generally is the thought that it's not as bad -- from a credit-score perspective -- as a foreclosure.
But that doesn't appear to be true, the folks at FICO say.
The credit-score company says on its analytics blog that it compared the effect of both types of distress sales on the scores of three different types of consumers. A foreclosure and a short sale represented an equal hit to the FICO score of all three, FICO said. (Thanks to HousingWire for noticing.) 
One commenter on that blog takes issue with the suggestion that it's all the same, arguing that someone who needs a security clearance would be out of luck with a foreclosure in their past and thus has a reason to push for a short sale. But it's not clear that defense officials see a difference, either.
Sheldon I. Cohen, an attorney who focuses on security-clearance issues, writes that the Department of Defense's Office of Hearings and Appeals has granted clearances to some with a short sale in their background and some with a foreclosure in their past, and it's also denied clearances to people who had a foreclosure or a short sale. The key is "good faith and moral behavior," he writes:

The common thread in all of these cases is that: (1) applicants were victims of circumstances not of their own doing; (2) they had not been speculators in the housing market who were caught when the bubble burst; (3) they had not succumbed to fraudulent schemes "too good to be true" as a result of their own greed; and (4) they had made good faith efforts to meet their other debts after the loss of their homes by foreclosure or short sale.
What do you think, guys? Anyone see an upside to a short sale -- from the exiting homeowner's perspective -- compared with a foreclosure?

Monday, April 4, 2011

Were your mortgage papers "Robosigned"?

New bank frauds are being exposed daily.  Were your documents forged by a robosigner?  Whether you are upside down, trying to modify, in foreclosure or post forclosure, you should know your rights.

Search your mortgage document signatures here:  http://www.whatsignature.com/searchdocuments.html

CBS 60 Minutes- The Second Mortgage Meltdown Crisis

In case you missed it: